- Long projects lose canon between models
- Revision roles blur into co-authoring
- Feedback lacks evidence and priority
writing workflow hub
Multi-model workflows for writing
Separate planning, canon extraction, drafting, criticism, editing, and final review without producing a pile of unrelated rewrites.

- Keep source text and canon attached to the relevant stages
- Name protected chapters, voice rules, and non-goals
- Require one accepted output, not ten versions
- Use local models for sensitive drafts when hardware permits
One flow, bounded owners.
| Stage | Purpose | Suggested ownership |
|---|---|---|
| Canon lock | Define protected facts, voice, and scope | Planner + context keeper |
| Draft or extract | Create the requested prose or evidence base | Writer or Researcher |
| Challenge | Find contradictions and weak transitions | Critic + devil’s advocate |
| Repair | Apply accepted corrections without restarting | Writer + editor |
| Acceptance | Check canon, completeness, and format | Reviewer + fact-checker |
Authored recipes
Start from a tested structure.
Manuscript continuity review
Turn a manuscript section and its canon notes into one reviewed continuity report with prioritized repairs.
Roles + task guides
Understand each responsibility.
Writer
Creates or revises prose to an explicit audience, purpose, voice, and format.
Critic
Finds weaknesses, contradictions, omissions, and failure risks without replacing the original objective.
Editor
Improves structure, clarity, consistency, and correctness while preserving meaning.
Context keeper
Protects the shared objective, canon, decisions, and accepted handoffs across a long workflow.
Build your first multi-model workflow
Choose one outcome, assign bounded roles, and run a coherent staged board.
Assign primary and support roles
Use role controls as behavior, not decoration.