Original workflow-engine report

Solo, Collaboration, and Dual routing compiler benchmark

Compile the same ten-box board into each supported orchestration topology without provider calls.

Crowned Majesty Obmil supervises three identical distant test bays occupied separately by Raging, Aqua, and Sunshine Obmils
Same protocol. Recorded environment. Repeatable evidence instead of model theater.

solo topology

10 routes

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10

MEDIAN1,471,001operations/second
5TH PERCENTILE901,821operations/second
95TH PERCENTILE1,845,805operations/second
SAMPLE WORK100,000iterations × 9 samples

collaboration topology

1 route

1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6 → 7 → 8 → 9 → 10

MEDIAN2,003,367operations/second
5TH PERCENTILE1,397,964operations/second
95TH PERCENTILE2,392,036operations/second
SAMPLE WORK100,000iterations × 9 samples

dual topology

2 routes

1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 · 6 → 7 → 8 → 9 → 10

MEDIAN1,544,341operations/second
5TH PERCENTILE710,567operations/second
95TH PERCENTILE1,700,956operations/second
SAMPLE WORK100,000iterations × 9 samples
Recorded environment
v24.14.0 · linux x64 · kernel 6.12.13
Timing
performance.now() monotonic wall-clock
Disclosure
Each throughput result reports median, 5th-percentile, and 95th-percentile operations per second. Re-run on the reader's device before using the values for capacity planning.
Source SHA-256
dece6fc835a3e8a2338d2d2b719f043fe462af30b6d97c8fd66f6827f1c06d57